
It was a cool Friday afternoon in Montreal, somewhere around the fall of 1987. I had taken the overnight train from Toronto to attend a friend’s wedding that Saturday. I loved taking the train that departed just before midnight and arrived early in the morning as I could sleep most of the way and between all those stops at tiny towns and cities along the way, not wasting any “productive time” en route. In Montreal I checked into this cute and cozy bed & breakfast I knew. It was clean, reasonable and centrally located right on Rue Sherbrooke.
I spent the morning checking out some of my favorite spots: Place Des Arts, Phillips Square, Bishop Ave., Campus of McGill and Atwater metro station, each one bringing back sweet and sometimes sad memories. After lunch at Pasha, I called a friend to get together for coffee and rehash even more memories. Somewhere between 3 and 4 in the afternoon, I made my way to the sidewalk in front of this large hotel across from my room to wait for her to pick me up. The winter wind that must start somewhere near the North Pole and often flies straight into the streets of Montreal, unobstructed and direct, had already started its annual visit to the city and the weak afternoon sun was no match for the cold air. I wrapped my scarf tighter around my neck, tucking the ends under my overcoat and prepared for my friend to be unfashionably late. Iranians are always late. I remember somewhere on an overseas flight reading an article about how to conduct business internationally and under Iran it said if you have a meeting with an executive or upper manager personnel and they show up on time, you can be sure he/she is not that important and is definitely not the decision maker. How sad, our secret is out for the world to know. I digressed.
As I’m waiting and watching the street for her familiar car, I notice somebody approaching from right. He gets my attention as he is talking to himself, sometimes quietly and then suddenly very loud. He is clothed in what you’d recognize as typical attire for a street or homeless person, or whatever the current PC term is. Old stained coat, several scarves, pants that haven’t been washed in a while and worn dirty shoes. He is probably in his late thirties or early forties, but looks many years older. I try not to stare and look the other way, aimlessly searching for her car again without much success. Suddenly I feel the homeless man standing very close to me. As I turn my face, the man I later find is named “Bob” has stopped besides me and with a calm voice and very deliberately says “Pepsi or Coke?” then without waiting for a reply continues to walk away.
I’m puzzled and a bit taken back. Before I get a chance to process what just happened in my mind, I see him turn around and again as he walks slowly by me, he turns ever so subtly saying “Pepsi or Coke?”, then walks away again. This was repeated twice more with Bob asking the same question then walking away chatting with himself, as if he was replying to his own query. Curiosity was killing me and despite knowing what had happened to the cat, I decided that I needed to find out more. So, the next time Bob turned around and got near me, I stepped forward almost blocking his path. Bob stopped, looked up into my eyes and said “Pepsi or Coke?”. As I asked what he meant, Bob found someone who’d listen to his story and we spent the next half hour or so chatting away. Well, in reality it was more like he talked and I occasionally mumbled a noise in agreement or even amazement, then he continued his stories unfazed by my interruptions.
It turns out Bob was an American and an ex-professor from a respected east coast university. He had “snapped” at some point, spending time in a hospital and then exiled by the community to the streets. Bob wasn’t sure how he had ended up in Montreal, just that he had come on a train hitching rides all over the continent as a Hobo. But he had enjoyed Canada and stayed for the past few years. He was articulate and had a large vocabulary. Yet he had difficulty concentrating on a topic and would often wonder off branching into other subjects and issues. It took him going through 15 other topics before he could tell me about his question.
I find out that without realizing it, I was standing right under a gigantic U.S. flag flying in front of the hotel along with about 10 or 12 other flags. Bob’s question wasn’t really for me; he would ask the same question whenever he came across the Star - Spangled Banner. He had probably done it for years and for all I know is still doing it someplace. The question was in reality his statement about the state of democracy in his homeland. Bob believed the only political choices left for Americans are like choosing between Coke and Pepsi. Both look the same, similar color and general feel, some subtle differences in taste and ingredients, but essentially the same. He’d say “but what if I’d want a cold beer, ginger ale or even a glass of water? Nope, sorry, not available!”
“Coke or Pepsi, Democrat or Republican, what is the difference? Really, what is the difference?” he said. Of course he would then wonder off, talking about the environment, the economy or corruption of the justice system, but he’d end up asking the same question; “Pepsi or Coke?”
The sound of my friend’s automobile horn interrupted our conversation. I look over and she is half way out of her car, waving her arms and trying to get my attention. I guess she had arrived several minutes earlier and was tired of waiting while I chatted with “some bum”. I look back and Bob had already left, walking fast several feet away, once again chatting with himself. He entered and left my life the same way; inconspicuous, understated and very quietly. However, looking back at something so brief and so long ago, he obviously left an impression.
As I read the statements by some of Democratic Party presidential hopefuls, the amount of money pledged already to the 2004 campaign of former Governor of Texas, recall the mess surrounding the “election” of 2000, think of how many different hurdles and obstacles are there to make it impossible for any credible third and fourth and fifth party candidates to seriously challenge any office, the good old boys network of who you know versus what you stand for and the biased and controlled media needed to get any message out to the average voter, I can’t help but think of Bob and wonder if there are any real choices left in America. Real choices besides Pepsi or Coke, besides Democrats or Republicans, besides bad and worst.
Next time a server asks if you’d like anything to drink, think of Bob and order ginger ale. Anything but Pepsi or Coke and be assured, as promised by another fellow Canadian Leonard Cohen; Democracy is coming to the U.S.A.

Excellent read.
Posted by: hooman at June 25, 2003 10:16 AMGreat post Pedram. Keep on writing!
Posted by: visitor at June 25, 2003 05:55 PMFunny you should bring this up.
I just read the "Democrats' DOA" chapter in Stupid White Men and how inefficient these democrats are that we are better off merging them with Republican together and have a single party.
Who are we kidding? big corporations are contributing to both parties.
I am curious to know how many Americans moved to Canada or Australia ever since Bush became the "president"?
Posted by: Ramin at June 25, 2003 06:02 PMthat was a good post. thanks.
Posted by: polo at June 25, 2003 08:42 PM"Bob" For PRESIDENT in 2004!
P.S. ; I want to know where you get all the great pictures and illustrations to go with your excellent articles.
Pedram,
I really enjoy reading your writings. Thanks for this piece.
It really bugs me when people complain about "no choices" in U.S. politics. That's complete nonsense. There is a very wide range beyond the Democratic and Republican parties.
1. Libertarian Party.
From that page: The Libertarian Party is committed to America's heritage of freedom:
- individual liberty and personal responsibility
- a free-market economy of abundance and prosperity
- a foreign policy of non-intervention, peace, and free trade.
A detailed party platform is at:
http://www.lp.org/issues/platform/platform_all.htm
2. Green Party.
Platform at:
http://www.greenparty.org/Platform.html
Bob has a good excuse for not knowing about the presence of alternatives to Republicans and Democrats, as he apparently is mentally ill. The vast majority of U.S. citizens have no such excuse. If, as U.S. citizens, they vote for "the lesser of two evils," that means they support evil. There is NEVER a good excuse, in a federal or state election, for voting for the "lesser of two evils."
It must be nice to live in the fantasy world Mark lives in.
How many congressmen are either greens or libertarian?
How 'bout senators?
Governors?
okay, how many presidents in the past two generations have been anything but democrat or republican?
Its not enough to HAVE other parties if there is no hope in hell for them to ever get elected to any position of influence. Particularly with the way campaign finances are set up in your country.
Now let's go back to our fantasy of actually having a democracy.
Posted by: visitor at June 30, 2003 10:35 PM"It must be nice to live in the fantasy world Mark lives in."
I don't live in a fantasy world. But I'll tell you what IS a fantasy world: Thinking that your one vote will EVER change the results of a federal or state election.
Even if you had lived in Florida in 2000 (arguably the closest presidential election likely to happen for the next 100+ years), and voted for Ralph Nader, rather than Al Gore, your ONE vote would not have changed the outcome.
That's why, if
"How many congressmen are either greens or libertarian? How 'bout senators? Governors? okay, how many presidents in the past two generations have been anything but democrat or republican?"
None, but ALL of those questions are COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT.
The RELEVANT questions are: 1) Will your one vote ever change the outcome? (Answer = No.) and 2) Will your picking a "winner" (a Republican or Democrat) make you any money, like picking a winner in a horse race? (Answer = No.)
You get absolutely NOTHING from picking a "winner" in an election. And your one vote will NEVER result in a Democrat being elected over a Republican (or vice versa).
So you should vote for the BEST PERSON. Always!
"Its not enough to HAVE other parties if there is no hope in hell for them to ever get elected to any position of influence."
Complete bullshit. Ross Perot had a HUGE impact on the 1992 election (forcing Bill Clinton and the Republicans to care about the national debt).
Likewise, in the early 20th century Socialists ran for positions in the U.S. Congress and for the presidency. Virtually none got elected. But almost all the POSITIONS they advocated eventually became law.
"Particularly with the way campaign finances are set up in your country."
So you don't even vote in U.S. elections???! @$%^! Why don't you mind your own business, then?
"So you don't even vote in U.S. elections???! @$%^! Why don't you mind your own business, then?"
You write constitutions for Iran and Iraq and rudely tell others to mind their own business???? Welcome to my banned list!
Posted by: Pedram M. at July 1, 2003 10:07 AMSome people on this post seem to be implicitly arguing for a multi-party system, but it is in no way clear that this is a superior structure.
Coalition governments, ie. a majority made up of several groups to small to hold it themselves, are often very weak, and thus would fall apart easily if one member party gets upset. For a good example, look to Israel. The current majority coalition includes ultra orthodox groups and settlement groups. Likud is forced to keep them content, but if they walk, the government would fall apart.
Biparty structures don't fear this. Having two parties tends to moderate political positions. The myriad other parties, Libertarian, Green, etc..., influence the content of the two main factions, but their extremeist views are moderated to make them more acceptable to a majority of voters. What you are essentially saying is that the American people are too stupid to pick what they want. I would contend the opposite, they have revealed their preferences. In order to have the biggest base possible, the parties must represent as many people as they can.
I like this moderation. I like that parties are forced to be liked by the majority. I don't like the coalition governments that consist of a bunch of special interests forced to sleep together.
As to the previous post about 3rd parties not being feasible, don't we remeber Governor Jesse the Body Ventura? There is one Independent in the House, and one in the Senate. Furthermore, the Republican Party was a third party upset. Proof that when people are dissastisfied with the reining two, a third will emerge to replace it.
Coke, or Pepsi, I try to stay away from caffeine and empty calories myself.
Posted by: Owen at July 7, 2003 02:48 PM